Are you guilty of having committed any offense? If yes, then you must be looking for a criminal defense attorney to help you get through the legal procedure. A good attorney is aware as to how your case should be handled and how the system can run smoothly. While choosing a defense attorney for your case, try to search one who has experience with your type of case so that he may be able to sort out your problems in the most efficient way. Ask your lawyer about the fee that he will charge for your case and keep the money ready with you. However, in case you cannot pay the fees of your lawyer on time, you will face unnecessary debt problems failing which you may have to take the help of debt relief program to become debt free.

5 Important steps to select a criminal defense lawyer

Go through this article to know about the 5 important steps to select a criminal defense lawyer and sort out your problems.

  1. Look for proper reference – While choosing a good attorney for your case, you may either call them up from a list of names or find attorneys as per their experience. If you are charged for driving your car in a drunken condition, you will be looking for a lawyer who has experience in defending DUI suspects.
  2. Check the background of the lawyer – It is important on your part to check the background of the lawyer before handing over your case to him. For this, you may take the help of Internet to collect at least some information about him. You may also get in touch with different associations to find out whether or not the lawyer you are choosing is well-disciplined.
  3. Ask the necessary questions – Before selecting a defense lawyer for your case, make it a point to know how long he has been practicing law, his experience with your kinds of case and how much charge he takes for each case. Also ask him whether or not he will handle your case or pass it to some other lawyer. Make it a point to know that he has proper license and bears malpractice insurance.
  4. Compare between various lawyers – You need to make a comparison between various lawyers in order to choose the right defense lawyer for your case. Talk with different lawyers to compare their fees and how they will deal with your case. This will enable you to choose the most suitable lawyer for your case.
  5. Be comfortable with the attorney you choose – While discussing your case with your lawyer, you need to be sure that you are comfortable with the attorney whom you have chosen. You should choose a lawyer who will be able to explain you your case in a way that you can understand clearly.

Getting involved in a crime and then looking for the right solution to come out of it is common for one who does a crime. By choosing a good defense lawyer, you will be able to come out of your problems in the most suitable way.

 

Although the holiday season is the time to be merry and enjoy with your friends and family, it is also the time of year when a lot of people become victim of theft and vandalism. Therefore, you have to be on the lookout at all times so that you do not become a victim of a crime when you least expect it. A few safety tips can help you be smart and celebrate the holiday season without any problems with your loved ones. These tips are listed below:

Be aware of your belongings – When you shop around in stores for your holiday shopping, never leave your purse unattended, like in the shopping cart. Always keep your wallet on you to avoid thefts. Similarly, never leave your cart unattended, especially once you are done shopping. Someone might reach into an unattended cart and steal personal belongings or items from it.

Identity theft – This is another major problem in the case of thefts. If you leave your purse or wallet and other personal belongings in the car or in the shopping cart, there is an increased risk of them being stolen. Therefore, authorities recommend that you carry your purse, money and other personal belongings on yourself.

Be aware of your surroundings – If you are shopping late and are in the parking lot of the super market, or driving around, keep an eye out for strangers and any other suspicious activity. The number of accidents increases as it gets darker outside and you could become a victim to theft or robbery.

Do not inform others of your activities – This is especially true when using electronic media such as Facebook to tell your friends about your whereabouts. Updating your Facebook status may seem completely harmless, but if you are planning to be away from home for long, to visit friends or family out-of-state, never update your Facebook status as it only announces to the world that your house in unattended.

Social media websites like Twitter and Facebook make it easy for burglars to find homes which are unattended. When planning to leave town, never openly inform to the world about you and your family’s whereabouts.

Use your ATM safely – Be observant and look around for any suspicious persons or activity near the ATM machine. If you feel something is not right, report it to the authorities immediately. You should also try and travelling late, especially at night.

Drive carefully – The number of drunken driving incidents also increase during the holiday season because it is the time when even busy and responsible people can become careless. Never drink and drive and if you do drink, have someone sober drive you home.

Answer the door carefully – Be careful when you open the door, especially when you are not expecting anyone. Criminals take advantage of the holiday season to prey on those who are unsuspecting, generous or careless.

Use these tips to stay safe during the holiday season and do not let your holidays be ruined by becoming the victim of a crime.

Author Bio

Richard Jacobs is a chief editor since early 2007, and he currently works for MyDUIattorney. A website that helps you to find the right DUI Attorney, you can search for a Philadelphia DUI Lawyer or forPhoenix DUI Lawyer online, anytime!

 

Having crimes and charges brought against you can easily be one of the most terrifying things you can experience. To make it even worse is if you are accused of having stolen property, but you know the items were not stolen, but are not able to provide the receipt right away. This is when you should know about the importance of having the Indiana criminal defense lawyer to represent you in your case. Some of the reasons to have this representation is the knowledge these individuals posses on what fits this crime, figuring out how to find a receipt for the item you bought, and even getting to convince people that you did not commit the crime, but are an innocent victim.

If you are facing criminal charges, contact our criminal defense lawyer now!

The proper knowledge on the law that fits this crime can be important for you to learn about. If you try to represent yourself, then you may have to deal with the law being what you think it is and not have knowledge on all the different ways it has been interpreted beforehand. However, with the lawyer it will be easy for you to see how the past cases have been settled and what kind of interpretation was used in these cases.

Finding the receipt is the best way to clear your name from the charges. However, if you try to locate this yourself it will be nearly impossible. With a court order the store or accuser will have to provide the receipts for that day and then you can have the firm look for the receipt with your purchase.

Getting to have knowledge on how to convince a jury or judge about the innocence is a skill which takes time to acquire. However, you can quickly see this will be possible with the lawyer because of the experience he or she has at getting this type of results.

Having to defend yourself in a criminal case can be a daunting task, but if you have the proper representation it can be easy to defend yourself from the charge of being in possession of stolen property. Some of this representation will come from the Indiana criminal defense lawyer and comes from the knowledge they have on what fits this crime, knowing how to find the receipt for the item you bought, and even convincing people you are not the one who committed the crime. Without this type of help it will be nearly impossible to properly defend yourself from the charges.

 

You’ve likely heard the horror stories from the DUI accident attorneys you happen to know – a friend, family member, or coworker. They’re driving home after bar close or even from work late at night – and they see the red and blue flashing lights behind them. A couple minutes pass and they find themselves pulled over and being questioned by an officer.


This article courtesy of accident lawyer experts at Accidents.com.


If you find yourself in this unlucky event, it’s not the time to panic. Take a few deep breaths and try to calm yourself down. Then, remember these tips:



  • Pull over in a safe place – If you’re on a highway or county road, pull over to the right side as soon as you have a chance. If you’re on a busier interstate, look for a safe place and get to the side as soon as possible.

  • Put your hands at 10 and 2 – After you get safely settled at the side of the road, turn on your dome light and place your hands on the steering wheel where the officer can see them.

  • Don’t argue or get defensive – The best thing you can do right now is agree with the officer and do everything he or she is asking of you. When they ask for your license and registration, calmly give it to them and try your best not to fumble with the documents.

  • You have the right to remain silent – Use it! We can’t emphasize this enough – you are under NO obligation to tell the officer yes or no. If he or she asks you if you’ve been drinking, don’t answer the question – regardless of if you’ve had one drink or way too many. Instead, say something like, “I don’t wish to answer the question at this time,” Or, “I’ve been advised not to answer questions like that.”

  • Don’t admit to taking any drugs – Even if you’re taking a prescription drug, don’t admit it to the officer. As mentioned above, say “I don’t wish to answer the question at this time,” because any type of drug (even OTC) can affect your driving and could be used against you in court.

  • Ask to be videotaped IF it will help you – Most officers have a video camera on their dash that can record interactions, even at a routine traffic stop. If you feel this would be to your benefit (if you haven’t been drinking or don’t think you’re over the legal limit), ask that this be turned on.

  • Refuse a Field Sobriety Test – Experts agree, you should always refuse a field sobriety test. Several factors can play into the results, and not in a positive way. Things like the weather, outside distractions, and flashing lights can all affect the results and make you appear more intoxicated than you are.

  • Don’t say “yes” to a search – If the officer requests to search your vehicle, you should always say no.

  • In most states, it’s okay to refuse a Breathalyzer test – One of the most common misconceptions about a Breathalyzer test is that everyone thinks they’re required to take one. If given the option, you should actually refuse it. Why? Because they can be inaccurate up to 50 percent due to several outside factors. If you haven’t been drinking or don’t think you’re over the limit, request a urine or blood test instead.


Keep in mind the above tips if you ever find yourself involved in a traffic stop. They can make a big difference in whether you’re taken to jail or walk away without punishment.

 

Resisting without violence refers to obstructing law enforcement officers from doing their duty. In Florida this is a misdemeanor offense. This usually is an additional charge, which increases the penalty. This is serious as most of the time you will not even realize that an extra charge has been added to the list.

Most common cases of resisting without violence are trying to flee from the law enforcers, or getting involved in an argument while the police officers are doing their investigation. Although this is a first degree misdemeanor offense, if the officer in charge feels that you have used physical violence, the charge can turn into a third degree felony offense and if proved, you may face up to 5 years imprisonment.

To save yourself from this type of penalty, you need to seek help from an experienced criminal lawyer. You should do some research before hiring the lawyer. In these types of legal cases only knowledge does not help. You need to hire someone with prior trial experience also.

You can ask your friends for reference or you can do some online research as well. Through the websites, you will not only find the contact details of the lawyer, you will get to read about the testimonials of the other clients. You should never hire a lawyer without doing some background checking first.

 

There are a number of crimes that come under white collar crime. Most of these crimes are committed for financial gain and does not involve any physical violence. In this category there are all types of frauds that are related to securities, insurance, internet, credit card, retail, accounting, bankruptcy, wire, pension plan and healthcare. Other than the frauds, money laundering, embezzlement, business crimes, kickbacks, tax evasion, false statements and counterfeiting are also included in white collar crimes. For individuals charged with the crime, it is important to hire a competent Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer to protect their legal rights.

Person found to be committing white collar crimes are prosecuted harshly. Every year US government suffers billions of dollars because of these crimes. If it is proved that the acts were well-planned, committed deliberately and motivated by profit then the person charged with the crime should be ready to face harsh punishment. It is important for the person charged with the white-collar crime to protect their legal rights. They need to take help of an experienced Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer from the start. In fact, sometimes they need their professional assistance even before they are charged, like when there is suspicion of being under investigation.

Generally high-ranking officials are charged with white collar crimes because they have access and authority to manage and control the funds. Such people include officers and employees working in banks, public offices and companies. Even if the fraud or embezzlement has been committed by a lower rank employee and involves small amount, the person will back off on our be charged for the crime and put behind bars. If the person suspects to be under investigation then it is time to seek legal assistance from Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer. By starting the defense process early there is a greater chance of remaining out of jail and avoiding serious charges that involve longer duration of prison terms.

Criminal defense lawyers use a variety of defenses to protect the legal rights of their clients. They can prove insufficient evidence placed by the prosecution. They can also prove person was incapable, did not have the intent, was suffering insanity at the time of offense, or the government created situations where the person was compelled to commit crime which he or she would not have committed in a normal situation. These are some of the defenses that are put up by Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer to contest the charges. The Garrison Law Firm is a reputed name in the field of criminal defense that has been protecting individual’s legal rights for several years. It is time to consult the experienced lawyers from this firm and avoid any harsh punishment.

 

WASHINGTON—Three former executives of Fair Financial Company (Fair), an Ohio financial services business, were arrested today and charged in an indictment filed in the Southern District of Indiana for their roles in a scheme to defraud approximately 5,000 investors of more than $200 million, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division; Timothy M. Morrison, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana; and Special Agent in Charge Michael E. Welch of the FBI in Indiana.

The indictment, returned by a federal grand jury on March 15, 2011, and unsealed today, charges Timothy S. Durham, 48; James F. Cochran, 55; and Rick D. Snow, 47, with one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud, and one count of securities fraud. Durham was arrested in Los Angeles, and Cochran and Snow were arrested in Indianapolis.

According to the indictment, Durham and Cochran purchased Fair, whose headquarters were in Akron, Ohio, in 2002. Durham was the chief executive officer of Fair and a member of the board of directors; Cochran was the chairman of the board of Fair; and Snow, a certified public accountant, served as the chief financial officer of Fair.

The indictment alleges that between approximately February 2005 through the end of November 2009, Durham, Cochran, and Snow executed a scheme to defraud Fair’s investors by making and causing others to make false and misleading statements about Fair’s financial condition and about the manner in which they were using Fair investor money. The indictment further alleges that Durham, Cochran, and Snow executed the scheme to enrich themselves, to obtain millions of dollars of investors’ funds through false representations and promises, and to conceal from the investing public Fair’s true financial condition and the manner in which Fair was using investor money.

According to the indictment, when Durham and Cochran purchased Fair in 2002, Fair reported debts to investors from the sale of investment certificates of approximately $37 million and income producing assets in the form of finance receivables of approximately $48 million. The indictment alleges that in November 2009, after Durham and Cochran had owned the company for seven years, Fair’s debts to investors from the sale of investment certificates had grown to more than $200 million, while Fair’s income producing assets consisted only of the loans to Durham and Cochran, their associates and the businesses they owned or controlled, which they claimed were worth approximately $240 million, and finance receivables of approximately $24 million.

“These former executives are charged with engaging in fraudulent and deceptive business practices to hide from investors and regulators Fair’s true financial condition and their misuse of the company’s funds,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer. “As alleged in the indictment, by using investors’ money to fund their failing business ventures and personal lifestyles, they perpetrated a $200 million fraud. Today’s charges and arrests reflect that investigating and prosecuting financial fraud is a Justice Department priority.”

“This has been an arduous journey, as are most large white-collar cases,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Morrison. “But we now welcome the opportunity to prove the indictment’s allegations against these three men beyond a reasonable doubt.”

“These arrests follow the largest corporate fraud investigation in the history of the FBI in Indiana which resulted in over 5,000 victims and an estimated loss of $200 million dollars,” said Special Agent in Charge Welch.

According to the indictment, when Durham and Cochran bought Fair in 2002, its primary business was purchasing and collecting finance receivables. Fair financed its purchase of finance receivables by selling investment certificates to investors. Investors who purchased investment certificates were promised regular interest payments for a set period of time, at the end of which they were entitled to the return of their principal investment.

In order to sell its investment certificates, Fair was required to register the investment certificates with the State of Ohio Division of Securities. Fair did so by submitting registration documents and a proposed “offering circular” to the Division of Securities that was required to contain truthful and accurate disclosures about Fair’s business.

The indictment alleges that after Durham and Cochran acquired Fair, they changed the manner in which the company operated and used its funds. Rather than using the funds Fair raised from investors primarily for the purpose of purchasing finance receivables, Durham and Cochran caused Fair to extend loans to themselves, their associates, and businesses they owned or controlled, which caused a steady and substantial deterioration in Fair’s financial condition.

According to the indictment, companies owned or controlled by Durham and Cochran, including DC Investments LLC (DCI) and Obsidian Enterprises Inc., as well as other businesses controlled through Obsidian and DCI, were among the primary beneficiaries of the loans Durham and Cochran made with Fair investor money. Durham and Cochran allegedly loaned money through Obsidian and DCI to a variety of struggling businesses and start-up ventures, including a car magazine, restaurants, a surgery center, trailer manufacturers, Internet companies, a race car team, a replica vintage car manufacturer, a rubber reclaiming plant, and a luxury bus-leasing business. The indictment further alleges that after receiving loans from Fair, many of these businesses failed and were never able to repay the money they borrowed, while others, with the benefit of continued loans from Fair, struggled as unprofitable entities for years. In addition, Durham and Cochran allegedly took loans of Fair investor money for themselves, and used a significant portion of the proceeds of the loans to maintain their lifestyles and to pay for personal expenses.

According to the indictment, Durham, Cochran, and Snow terminated Fair’s independent accountants who, at various points during 2005 and 2006, told the defendants that many of Fair’s loans were impaired or did not have sufficient collateral. The indictment alleges that after firing the accountants, the defendants never released audited financial statements for 2005 and never obtained or released audited financial statements for 2006 through September 2009. The indictment further alleges that with independent accountants no longer auditing Fair’s financial statements, the defendants were able to conceal from investors Fair’s true financial condition.

The indictment also alleges that Durham, Cochran, and Snow falsely represented, in registration documents and offering circulars submitted to the Division of Securities and in offering circulars distributed to investors, that the loans on Fair’s books were assets that could support Fair’s sale of investment certificates. According to the indictment, the defendants knew that in reality, the loans were worthless or grossly overvalued; producing little or no cash proceeds; supported by insufficient or non-existent collateral to assure repayment; and in part advances, salaries, bonuses, and lines of credit for Durham and Cochran’s personal expenses.

The indictment alleges that the defendants engaged in a variety of other fraudulent activities to conceal from the Division of Securities and from investors Fair’s true financial health and cash flow problems, including making false and misleading statements to concerned investors who either had not received principal or interest payments on their certificates from Fair or who were worried about Fair’s financial health, and directing employees of Fair not to pay investors who were owed interest or principal payments on their certificates. According to the indictment, even though Fair’s financial condition had deteriorated and Fair was experiencing severe cash flow problems, Durham and Cochran continued to funnel Fair investor money to themselves for their personal expenses; to their family, friends, and acquaintances; and to the struggling businesses that they owned or controlled.

An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Also today, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil securities charges against Durham, Cochran, and Snow.

This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Winfield D. Ong and Joe H. Vaughn of the Southern District of Indiana and Assistant Chief Robertson Park and Trial Attorney Henry P. Van Dyck of the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division. The investigation was led by the FBI in Indianapolis.

Durham, Cochran, and Snow each face a maximum of five years in prison for the conspiracy count, 20 years in prison for each wire fraud count, and 20 years in prison for the securities fraud count. Additionally, each defendant could be fined $250,000 for each count of conviction. An initial hearing was held today in Indianapolis before a U.S. Magistrate Judge Kennard Foster for Cochran and Snow, and an initial hearing for Durham will be held in Los Angeles.

This prosecution is part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information about the task force visit: www.stopfraud.gov.

 

TERRE HAUTE, IN—Joseph H. Hogsett, United States Attorney, announced today that John D. Love, Brazil, Ind., was charged with health care fraud and money laundering following an investigation by the Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS); The Internal Revenue Service (IRS); the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); and Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller’s Medicaid Fraud Enforcement Unit (MFCU). The information alleges that beginning on or about January 1, 2006, and continuing through September 2010, John Love, a pharmacist and controlling member of the Terre Haute Prescription Shop, used his position at the pharmacy to carry out a scheme to defraud the Indiana Medicaid Program.

If you or a loved one has been charged with fraud or money laundering, contact our Terre Haute Fraud Lawyer now!

Love submitted claims to the Indiana Medicaid Program for prescriptions that were never given to patients. Love used his access and knowledge of the THPS computer system to input false prescriptions into the THPS’s computer billing system, which would then bill the Indiana Medicaid Program for the fraudulent claim. As soon as the computer system submitted the claim for the prescription to the Indiana Medicaid Program, Love would access the computer system again and void the prescription before any other employee of THPS could notice a record for a prescription that was never filled or dispensed.

As part of his scheme, the information further alleges Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for prescription drugs significantly in excess of what THPS had ever ordered, for example:

  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 1,317.4 units of the prescription drug Aranesp and received a total of $1,677,554.50. During the same time period, THPS only ordered six units of Aransep at a cost of $5,188.36.
  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 172 units of the prescription drug Copaxone and received a total of $236,989.54. During the same time period THPS only ordered 20 units of Copaxone at a cost of $29,265.87.
  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 660 units of the prescription drug Epogen and received a total of $126,732.80. During the same time period, THPS only ordered 10 units of Epogen at a cost of $2,545.69.
  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 588 units of the prescription drug Humira and received a total of $429,959.82. During the same time period, THPS only ordered 98 units of Humira at a cost of $62,693.53.
  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 1,488 units of the prescription drug Procrit and received a total of $615,612.23. During the same time period, THPS only ordered 22 units of Procrit at a cost of $6,366.40.
  • Love billed the Indiana Medicaid Program for 2,630 units of the prescription drug Sandostatin and received a total of $343,334.58. During the same time period, THPS did not order any units of Sandostatin.

As a result of Love’s fraudulent acts, the Indiana Medicaid Program paid THPS $3,575,699.73 for prescriptions that were never provided to patients. These funds were deposited into the main business account of THPS. Using his control of THPS, Love used at least $3,000,000 of the fraudulent proceeds to purchase, in whole or in part, four parcels of real estate; 15 vehicles, including five Harley Davidson motorcycles, a Chevrolet Corvette, and a Cadillac Escalade; a destination wedding for one of his children in Destin, Florida; and numerous other personal expenses. The money laundering charges concern the purchase of one Harley Davidson motorcycle and the destination wedding.

U.S. Attorney Hogsett stated, “The United States Attorney’s Office will continue to aggressively prosecute Medicaid fraud. Individuals who, through their own greed, take benefits intended to serve the neediest citizens, will be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

“Health care fraud is a serious problem in Indiana and is vigorously investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and our law enforcement partners. The FBI will continue to use a wide array of investigative techniques to recover taxpayer dollars and root out those who corrupt the health care system,” said Michael Welch, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“The charges brought today against Mr. Love clearly serve as a warning that federal and state governments are tightly coordinating the investigation and prosecution of Medicaid fraud,” said Lamont Pugh III, Special Agent in Charge of the Chicago Region of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. “Criminals who would line their pockets at the expense of tax payers and vulnerable patients can expect both federal and state authorities to be in hot pursuit.”

Al Patton, Special Agent in Charge of the IRS said, “IRS Criminal Investigation has the financial investigators and expertise that is critical in locating the money. We work closely with our partners in law enforcement and our partners at the United States Attorney’s Office to ensure the defendants are brought to justice.”

“For a pharmacist to bill the taxpayers millions of dollars for prescription drugs that doctors never ordered and patients never received is a brazen abuse of the Medicaid system. The Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit collaborates closely with our federal colleagues to unravel such schemes so that those who try to game the system will be held accountable,” Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said.

As part of the investigation, federal authorities seized five Harley Davidson motorcycles, two sports cars (a Corvette and a Mustang), four sport utility vehicles, two pickup trucks, one four-wheeler RV and trailer, and funds from multiple bank accounts. The government will be seeking forfeiture of these and other assets.

According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Bradley P. Shepard, who is prosecuting the case for the government, Love faces a maximum of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. An initial hearing will be scheduled for an initial appearance and arraignment in Terre Haute before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.

An information is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

 

DUI Statistics

in most cases, drivers found having a blood alcohol content greater than .08% will face arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol. Likewise, drivers found under the influence of many other substances, such as prescription medication, illicit drugs, over the counter medications, or even extreme fatigue, may also face arrest for DUI. The following highlights recent DUI statistics and other salient points for all drivers, of all ages, to note.

  • Drivers under the age of twenty-one (21) face arrest for DUI if found having a blood alcohol content (BAC) higher than .01% in most states
  • In 2006 there were 533 fatal motor vehicle accidents, of which 207 involved alcohol as attributing to the accident
  • In 2006, nearly a third of all traffic accident deaths involved automobile accidents with drivers having a blood alcohol concentration higher than the legal limit of .08%
  • Driving under the influence (DUI) and other driving while impaired offenses are misdemeanor charges that face criminal, as well as administrative penalties regarding driver’s license privileges
  • Driving under the influence (DUI) and other driving while impaired offenses that result in bodily injury, grievous property damage, or death of passengers, other drivers, or pedestrians are felonies in in most instances
  • Nationally, one out of every one hundred and thirty-nine drivers will face arrest for driving under the influence (DUI) in their lifetime
  • Nationally, nearly 1.4 million drivers are arrested for driving under the influence annually according to the NHTSA
  • One-third of arrests for driving under the influence involved repeat offenders
  • An average of one person per minute is injured in an automobile accident directly attributed to the influence of alcohol

For more information regarding the rights and legal options of individuals accused of DUI in Indiana, contact one of the experienced Indiana DUI lawyers with the Garrison Law Firm for complete legal counsel today.

 

Here are the possible results for those charged with driving under the influence in Indiana.

  • Persons convicted of driving with a blood alcohol of at least .08% but less than .15% commit a class C misdemeanor.
  • Persons convicted of driving with a blood alcohol of .15% or more commit a class A misdemeanor.
  • Those who are convicted of driving while intoxicated commit a class C misdemeanor.

If the defendant is convicted of driving while intoxicated and also of having endangered another person in doing so, it is a class A misdemeanor.

A conviction for either having a blood alcohol of .08% or higher or of driving while intoxicated, the conviction will result in a conviction for a class D Felony if there is a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated. I told you it was complicated.

If you are facing drunk driving charges in Indiana, contact our Indiana drunk driving lawyers now!

Where there is a conviction of driving while having a blood alcohol of at least .08 and there is a prior conviction within the past five years for driving while intoxicated, the offense is a class D felony.

In all these cases, the statute now provides for a mandatory suspension of driving privileges of at least 90 days. The rules are complicated and lengthy, so we will not review them here, but suffice it to say a loss of license is a given, where the defendant is convicted at all. Provisions are present for restricted license arrangements, but even those are subject to an initial mandatory suspension. Almost nobody goes to jail for drunk driving in Indiana, at least not the first time, unless other misconduct or an accident as been involved. But those subsequent offense convictions, particularly those that are class D felonies, can be expected to provide for a short vacation as the guest of the county. I told you it was tough, and it is. Any person who has sustained a conviction for one of these offenses must decide to change their driving and drinking habits forever. The consequence of landing in jail is most unpleasant.

GLF godaddy © 2011 Criminal Defense Lawyer Criminal Defense Lawyer Websites by SEO Does Matter Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha